Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 07:43
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
With a housing crisis going on, should we make owning properties illegal?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is the meaning of xx in texting?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is it possible for doctors to diagnose prostate cancer just by looking at a patient?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Earth’s oldest living creature unearthed—dating back 700 million years - The Brighter Side of News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thousands of Kroger, Albertsons grocery store workers vote to strike - KIRO 7 News Seattle
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear: